Skip to content

CASE 03 · SYSTEMATIC TRADING

IMC Prosperity 4

Round 1: #77 worldwide, #1 in France · Final: #514 worldwide, #17 in France.

COMPETITION FIELD~20,000

18,803 teams from 1,549 universities.

ROUND 1 ALGO#77

Worldwide · #1 in France.

FINAL ALGO#514

Worldwide · #17 in France.

RESEARCH CYCLE6 ROUNDS

Baseline quoting to 50 products.

RESEARCH PROGRESSION

Every round changed the market—and the process.

The framework supported reproducible comparisons while the research expanded from quoting rules to volatility structure, flow identities and large-universe relative value.

R0–R1 · Reliable base layer

Common backtester, submission path, inventory-aware and signal-aware quoting variants.

R2 · Explicit payoff landscapes

Turn qualitative manual prompts into game-theoretic scoring and robust allocation decisions.

R3 · Options and volatility

Smile diagnostics, Greeks, passive quoting, hedging and portfolio-level strategy comparisons.

R4 · Counterparty-aware flow

Trader-specific features and selective fading, with toxic components disabled or downweighted.

R5 · Fifty-product universe

Group structure, pair relationships, carry and specialist overlays merged after attribution.

EMPIRICAL RECORD

Paths, diagnostics and outcomes.

All values are competition or backtest units—not investment returns. The final standing remains visible alongside the strong early-round result.

IMC Prosperity Round 1 ranking
FIGURE 01 · ROUND 1#77 worldwide · #1 in France

The highlighted point reconstructs the team outcome against the competition field.

Manual trading payoff landscape
FIGURE 02 · MARKET DESIGNManual payoff landscape

A qualitative prompt becomes an explicit expected-payoff and rank-multiplier surface.

Round 3 volatility smile diagnostics
FIGURE 03 · OPTIONSVolatility-smile diagnostics

Strike-level structure monitored across days and intraday snapshots.

Round 3 strategy comparison
FIGURE 04 · SELECTIONStrategy-family comparison

Equity paths and drawdowns inform candidate selection alongside terminal PnL.

Final algorithmic competition standing
FIGURE 05 · FINAL OUTCOMEFinal standing preserved with context

The archive reports the complete result rather than presenting only the strongest intermediate round.

INFRASTRUCTURE AS RESEARCH

The framework was part of the alpha process.

Shared execution, diagnostics, product attribution, ablations and an exact submission archive reduced comparison noise and made failed candidates useful.

LIMIT

A competition is a synthetic market.

In-game liquidity, counterparties and scoring rules do not establish real-market profitability. The value lies in research iteration, integration and disciplined evidence.

Public BTCUSDT stream · display only · auto-stop after 10 min