R0–R1 · Reliable base layer
Common backtester, submission path, inventory-aware and signal-aware quoting variants.
BTC/USDT—
LATENCY—
CASE 03 · SYSTEMATIC TRADING
Round 1: #77 worldwide, #1 in France · Final: #514 worldwide, #17 in France.
18,803 teams from 1,549 universities.
Worldwide · #1 in France.
Worldwide · #17 in France.
Baseline quoting to 50 products.
RESEARCH PROGRESSION
The framework supported reproducible comparisons while the research expanded from quoting rules to volatility structure, flow identities and large-universe relative value.
Common backtester, submission path, inventory-aware and signal-aware quoting variants.
Turn qualitative manual prompts into game-theoretic scoring and robust allocation decisions.
Smile diagnostics, Greeks, passive quoting, hedging and portfolio-level strategy comparisons.
Trader-specific features and selective fading, with toxic components disabled or downweighted.
Group structure, pair relationships, carry and specialist overlays merged after attribution.
EMPIRICAL RECORD
All values are competition or backtest units—not investment returns. The final standing remains visible alongside the strong early-round result.

The highlighted point reconstructs the team outcome against the competition field.

A qualitative prompt becomes an explicit expected-payoff and rank-multiplier surface.

Strike-level structure monitored across days and intraday snapshots.

Equity paths and drawdowns inform candidate selection alongside terminal PnL.

The archive reports the complete result rather than presenting only the strongest intermediate round.
INFRASTRUCTURE AS RESEARCH
Shared execution, diagnostics, product attribution, ablations and an exact submission archive reduced comparison noise and made failed candidates useful.
LIMIT
In-game liquidity, counterparties and scoring rules do not establish real-market profitability. The value lies in research iteration, integration and disciplined evidence.